Degree Name

Education Specialist (EdS)

Semester of Degree Completion

1993

Thesis Director

David E. Bartz

Abstract

This study examined the perceptions board presidents had toward the processes, procedures, and methods used by their boards of education to evaluate their superintendents. Data were obtained from a survey sent to the board presidents of 66 school districts in Central Illinois. Eighty-five percent of the boards of education used a formal written process to evaluate their superintendents. Nearly 92% of the presidents reported satisfaction with this process. The most popular formal methods were evaluations by goals and objectives and checklists. The major reason cited by board presidents for holding evaluations was to identify areas in which their superintendents needed to improve and for accountability. Most boards evaluate their superintendents annually. It was recommended that evaluations be dynamic, not static and be an on-going process.

Share

COinS