Examining the Employment Profile of Institutions Under the Mission-Driven Classification System and the Impact of Collective Bargaining

Authors

Louis Shedd, National Center SubscribersFollow
Stephen G. Katsinas, University of AlabamaFollow
Nathaniel Bray, The University of AlabamaFollow

Author ORCID Identifier

0000-0002-2032-8762

Abstract

The focus of this study is an analysis of institutions, salary expenditures, employment categories (full-time professors by academic rank), and number and average pay of full-time faculty. Our new mission-driven classification system provides the framework for the analysis and specifically presents the data by both the presence or lack of a collective bargaining agreement. The goal of this paper is to illustrate differences in monetary compensation of full time faculty using the mission-driven classification system (as opposed to the Carnegie Classification) and to see the impact of the presence or lack of collective bargaining agreements. We argue that the Carnegie Classification is not how state officials--governors, legislators, and the general public view higher education in America. We argue that a public frame is needed to understand, support, and advance public higher education. We present data that shows difference by geographic type (rural, suburban, urban) for a much more precise understanding of how collective bargaining impacts faculty salaries.

Recommended Citation

Shedd, Louis; Katsinas, Stephen G.; and Bray, Nathaniel (2020) "Examining the Employment Profile of Institutions Under the Mission-Driven Classification System and the Impact of Collective Bargaining," Journal of Collective Bargaining in the Academy: Vol. 11, Article 5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58188/1941-8043.1865
Available at: https://thekeep.eiu.edu/jcba/vol11/iss1/5

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.58188/1941-8043.1865