Faculty Research & Creative Activity
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
January 2017
Abstract
In mid-July, 1860, the Athenaeum published a summary of the discussions about Charles Darwin’s theory that took place at the British Association meeting in Oxford. Its account omitted the famous exchange between Samuel Wilberforce, Bishop of Oxford, and Thomas Huxley, the rising man of science. A fuller report of the meeting was published a week later in a local weekly, the Oxford Chronicle, but this has gone unnoticed by historians. The Oxford Chronicle supplies a new version of Wilberforce’s question to Huxley, with more material about religious objections to human evolution and the proper role of authority in popular scientific discussions. Excerpts from the Athenaeum and Oxford Chronicle accounts show that they likely had a common ancestor, and other sources corroborate details given only in the Oxford Chronicle. This discovery reveals that the Athenaeum narrative – until now the longest and best known – was censored to remove material that was considered objectionable. The Oxford Chronicle gives us a fuller story of what was said and how the audience reacted to the encounter between Huxley and Wilberforce.
Recommended Citation
England, Richard, "Censoring Huxley and Wilberforce: A new source for the meeting that the Athenaeum ‘wisely softened down’" (2017). Faculty Research & Creative Activity. 20.
https://thekeep.eiu.edu/phil_fac/20
https://works.bepress.com/richard-england/1/
