Master of Arts (MA)
Semester of Degree Completion
Melinda A. Mueller
Decades of research in Social Psychology have demonstrated that political intolerance is not displayed equally with respect to ideology. In particular, conservatives and those with right-wing beliefs are much more likely to display intolerant judgments than those with liberal or left-wing beliefs. This "prejudice gap" has been found to be so ubiquitous that it is now the conventional wisdom regarding the relationship between ideology and intolerance. However, a small, but growing literature challenges this presumed ideological asymmetry and has instead found that liberals and conservatives display intolerance under certain circumstances. Synthesizing the recent research showing ideological symmetry in intolerance judgments, the Ideological-Conflict Hypothesis (ICH) was developed. This thesis attempts to expand the literature on the ICH by integrating it with multidimensional models of ideology and the growing literature on negative emotions. The findings of this analysis support the general assertion made by the ICH, but also challenges its utility when predicted by multidimensional models of ideology. Additionally, the analysis shows the crucial role of an understudied emotion in determining political intolerance: hatred. The analysis thus challenges scholars to better integrate the findings of the ICH with more complete models of ideology, while expanding the research of emotional effects on intolerance to include hatred.
Cain, Matthew, "Political Intolerance in the 21st Century: The Role of Ideology and Emotion in Determining Intolerant Judgments" (2015). Masters Theses. 2339.